A few years ago, in the 'Bournewood' case, someone with a learning disability was taken to a
mental health hospital for treatment. His carers said he should come home but the hospital
said he should stay. He wasn't detained under the Mental Health Act but was kept in hospital
because staff believed it was in his best interests. He was unable to speak but was clearly
unhappy, so this went to court. Because of this case new rules are needed to protect people
who may need to be deprived of their liberty in hospitals or in care homes to make sure that
it happens when it is in their best interests and there are no other alternatives.
The Bournewood case was about a man whose liberty was taken away. Liberty means being free to do
the things you want to do and live where you want to live. There are many ways that someone's
liberty can be taken away in a hospital or care home. When deciding if someone has had their
liberty taken away it is important to look at things like:
- Staff having control over all decisions in a person's life
- Having to stay somewhere and not being allowed to leave
- Carers not being allowed to take someone home
- Unnecessary restrictions on being allowed to see friends or family
But it will always depend on each situation whether or not that person has had their
liberty taken away.
Depriving people of their liberty should only happen when it is absolutely necessary and in the
person's best interests. The Deprivation of Liberty safeguards aim to make sure that any decision
to take away someone's liberty is made following a detailed authorisation process.